Developages - Development and Technology Blog

Filed under: GPS, Wearables

To be fair, we haven’t really noticed a GPS watch that wasn’t at least somewhat unsightly, but the Sport Genius Watch Tracker does a phenomenal job at exemplifying ugly. Reportedly, the conglomerate not only tells time, but the built-in GSM / GPS modules enable it to make and receive calls, track your movements and beam out your current location via SMS in case you find yourself in a pickle. It also provides the means for logging runs and points of interest, and you can supposedly upload the data to mapping software to get a visual on what you accomplished. Word on the street has it that this particular wristwatch should be available on the streets of China right now, but there’s no telling how many yuan you’ll be asked to fork over in order to publicly humiliate yourself.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

holy_calamity writes “The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency was founded in 1958 after the Soviets shocked the world by launching Sputnik. New Scientist recounts the history of the agency charged with protecting the US from ‘technological surprise’ and lists some of its most spectacular successes and failures.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by ScuttleMonkey

Noah Shachtman on Wired.com’s Danger Room reports that Monday, the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson AFB introduced a two-year, $11 million effort to put together hardware and software tools for ‘Dominant Cyber Offensive Engagement.’ ‘Of interest are any and all techniques to enable user and/or root level access,’ a request for proposals notes, ‘to both fixed (PC) or mobile computing platforms … any and all operating systems, patch levels, applications and hardware.’ This isn’t just some computer science study, mind you; ‘research efforts under this program are expected to result in complete functional capabilities.’ The Air Force has already announced their desire to manage an offensive BotNet, comprised of unwitting participatory computers. How long before they slip a root kit on you?

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by Jeremiah Cornelius (posted by timothy)

sowjetarschbajazzo writes “Air Force Col. Charles W. Williamson III believes that the United States military should maintain its own botnet, both as a deterrent towards those who would attempt to DDoS government networks, and an offensive weapon to be used against the networks of unfriendly nations, criminal groups, or terrorist organizations. “Some people would fear the possibility of botnet attacks on innocent parties. If the botnet is used in a strictly offensive manner, civilian computers may be attacked, but only if the enemy compels us. The U.S. will perform the same target preparation as for traditional targets and respect the law of armed conflict as Defense Department policy requires by analyzing necessity, proportionality and distinction among military, dual-use or civilian targets. But neither the law of armed conflict nor common sense would allow belligerents to hide behind the skirts of its civilians. If the enemy is using civilian computers in his country so as to cause us harm, then we may attack them.” What does Slashdot think of this proposal?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by CmdrTaco

Wired is running a story about a recent security exercise in which the NSA attacked networks set up by various US military academies. The Army’s network scored the highest, put together using Linux and FreeBSD by cadets at West Point. Quoting: “Even with a solid network design and passable software choices, there was an element of intuitiveness required to defend against the NSA, especially once it became clear the agency was using minor, and perhaps somewhat obvious, attacks to screen for sneakier, more serious ones. ‘One of the challenges was when they see a scan, deciding if this is it, or if it’s a cover,’ says [instructor Eric] Dean. Spotting ‘cover’ attacks meant thinking like the NSA — something Dean says the cadets did quite well. ‘I was surprised at their creativity.’ Legal limitations were a surprising obstacle to a realistic exercise. Ideally, the teams would be allowed to attack other schools’ networks while also defending their own. But only the NSA, with its arsenal of waivers, loopholes, special authorizations (and heaven knows what else) is allowed to take down a U.S. network.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by Soulskill

Filed under: Networking

Considering that mechanical beings will be fighting our real wars here in just a few years, it’s no shock to see more focus placed on the areas where actual humans will still be the ones waging. DARPA is looking to create what it calls a National Cyber Range, which would essentially act as a training ground for cyber warriors. The setup would enable defense gurus to simulate battle against attacks our on nation’s most highly prized data, and of course, give victors over virtual phishing scams immense bragging rights. Come to think of it, Estonia could have totally benefited from something like this last year.

[Via Information Week, image courtesy of Sandia]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Filed under: Robots

From what we’ve seen, the British military is pretty savvy on its robotics. Apparently mechanical beings aren’t integrated enough, however, as the British Ministry of Defense has launched its first ever Grand Challenge, which “encourages participants to turn their ideas into prototypes for machines the army can use in urban environments.” The six finalists that were chosen each received around $600,000 in order to construct their contraptions, and this August, we’ll see an unmanned buggy that can analyze a gunman’s movements, a self-propelled, remote-controlled camera and minuscule helicopters used for reconnaissance missions. Best of all, these creations won’t just be propped up on some shiny display — oh no, they’ll be taking part in a mock battle in Copehill Down, with even more loot and an enviable trophy on the line.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Gerhardius writes “Werner Nickel sounds like a Disney-style wacky inventor. He moved to the UAE to develop his previous invention: he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand. That project failed so he moved on to the next item on his agenda, naturally a radar absorbing paint. While it certainly is not unique, there is some interesting history behind the development, and a proposed civilian use.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

Gerhardius writes “Werner Nickel sounds like a Disney-style wacky inventor. He moved to the UAE to develop his previous invention: he had bred a worm whose excrement made it possible to grow radishes in the dry desert sand. That project failed so he moved on to the next item on his agenda, naturally a radar absorbing paint. While it certainly is not unique, there is some interesting history behind the development, and a proposed civilian use.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

Filed under: Cellphones

That Air France in-flight calling trial is now well underway, and it looks like there’s still some kinks left to iron out. The New York Times hitched a ride on a recent flight featuring tests of the system, and found that things weren’t quite working up to snuff: voice quality was said to be like “talking to a small robot,” only six passengers could get a signal at a time, Blackberry email didn’t work, and calls placed from the ground to cell phones in the air went straight to voicemail. That’s a pretty long list for a system that’s been talked about for a couple years now — let’s hope OnAir manages to clear up some of these glitches before angry passengers revolt over not only having to listen to other people’s conversations, but also their screaming over bad connections.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Nilay Patel

Filed under: Cellphones, Wireless

Not even a week after hearing that Air France was forging ahead with an in-flight calling trial, the European Commission has now voiced its approval of using mobiles on planes in European airspace. After six months of deliberating, the decision was finally made to give airlines the choice of offering up services in order for guests to dial loved ones at 3,000-meters or more. The EU telecoms commissioner, Viviane Reding, went on to warn operators to “keep the cost of calls made on planes at a reasonable level,” and of course, not all is clear just yet. For starters, the European Aviation Safety Agency still needs to green-light the whole ordeal by approving any hardware that would be used, and we won’t be seeing any 3G action up high just yet. Still, at least one less hurdle stands in the way of you phoning home from over Europe (and simultaneously making enemies out of all your neighbors trying to get a few decent minutes of shuteye).

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Filed under: Cellphones, Transportation

Not even half a year after Air France enabled passengers on its single OnAir-equipped Airbus A318 to send / receive messages and e-mail, the airline has went live with the second phase of the in-flight experiment. As of this week, guests who find themselves aboard the aforesaid aircraft can make / receive calls on their mobile at 30,000 feet. Reportedly, a dozen simultaneous calls are possible “per picocell network, as well as unlimited text messages and e-mails,” and while pricing details weren’t disclosed, you can rest assured it won’t be a bargain. Nevertheless, the voice aspect of the trial is scheduled to carry on for three months, and we’re assuming the results (read: whether annoyed passengers start assaulting chronic yappers) will determine if it gets rolled out to more of the fleet or quietly buried.

[Via WiFi Net News]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Filed under: Peripherals, Storage

We hear it’s pretty tough being a gadget with an identity crisis, and unfortunately for Asus’ MS71, it definitely feels that pain. Thankfully for consumers who aren’t turned off by rectangular (or atypically slender) mice, at least it provides a bit of extra utility. Quite simply, the base of the critter snaps off to plug into any open USB port; from there, it enables what’s left to function as a wireless mouse and allows users to store an undisclosed amount of files on the appendage. No word on pricing or availability, but unless you place absolutely no value on ergonomics, we’d probably look elsewhere.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Filed under: Storage

No, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard of innocent consumers snagging some new kit only to find random bits of unwanted garbage in place of the actual product, but unfortunately, we’ve all ideas it’s not the last. This go ’round, a couple waltzed into Best Buy, snagged a “brand new” $300 hard drive and zoomed home to start packin’ those platters. Much to their dismay, no HDD was found inside the box — rather, three bags of dried beans weighed it down enough to not seem suspicious. As expected, Best Buy wasn’t about to refund any money for fear that the actual purchasers could be the culprits, and while that’s certainly understandable, we’re quite relieved to know that a little outside intervention netted the two a $300 gift card to the retailer. We bet they’ll inspect that package a bit more closely before taking it home next time (sad though that may be).

[Image courtesy of DKImages, thanks Craig]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Filed under: Laptops

Our tip jar, it brings us so much joy — and it brings you, dear reader, this printout of what’s purported to be the Best Buy database listing for one of those heretofore-unknown MacBook model numbers. You’ll note that whatever MB402LL/A turns out to be, it’s said to be in stock on March 2nd, which is just a few days away — but also note that current MacBook Pros have MA-series model numbers, while the regular MacBook has traditionally carried the MB designation. That’s interesting, but we doubt a $1,999 MacBook is about to surface — besides, the current MacBook box is 15 inches square, smaller than the 17 inches listed here. (Yes, we measured.) As always, we’ll see when we see — come on Tuesday, you’re almost here.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Nilay Patel