Developages - Development and Technology Blog

Whiteox writes “The Australian Prime Minister’s plan to equip high schools with ‘one laptop per child’ may go open source. Kevin Rudd’s $56 million digital revolution will include ‘laptops [that will] run on an open source operating system with a suite of open source applications like those packaged under Edubuntu. This would include Open Office for productivity software, Gimp for picture editing and the Firefox internet browser.’ So far this has been considered for New South Wales and I think other states may follow.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by kdawson

Filed under: Handhelds

Alright kids, it’s time for honesty. Here’s a tidbit your 3rd-grade teacher isn’t about to admit, but he / she and everyone else in the world crams for tests. Sorry, we know you totally believed that each and every noble student dutifully set aside hours per day to prepare for that big final, but in reality, every kid in your classroom just got on the study train a few hours ago. To that end, LeapFrog has concocted a perfectly named study aid dubbed the Crammer ($59.99; available now), which enables kids to “quickly navigate more than 16,000 mathematics, social studies and science quiz questions based on leading school textbooks.” Additionally, students can create customized digital flash cards for on-the-go cramming, and the built-in Spanish translator even gives you an edge in the foreign language department. Seriously, where was this at when we were using abacuses and carving English reports into stone tablets?

[Via PopGadget]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph

Zarf writes “I′d like to file a bug report on the US educational system. The New York Times reports on a recent study that shows the US fails to encourage academic talent as a culture.’”There is something about the culture in American society today which doesn′t really seem to encourage men or women in mathematics,” said Michael Sipser, the head of M.I.T.’s math department. “Sports achievement gets lots of coverage in the media. Academic achievement gets almost none.”‘ While we’ve suspected that the US might be falling behind academically, this study shows that it is actually due to cultural factors that are devaluing the success of our students. I suspect there’s a flaw in the US cultural system that prevents achievement on the academic front as valuable. Could anyone suggest a patch for this bug or is this cause for a rewrite?”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News′s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News′s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

An anonymous reader writes “US News makes a mint off its college rankings every year, but do they really give meaningful information? A pair of mathematicians argues that the data the magazine uses is all likely to be at least somewhat relevant, but that the way the magazine weights the different statistics is pretty arbitrary. After all, different people may have different priorities. So they developed a method to compute the rankings based on any possible set of priorities. To do it, they had to reverse-engineer some of US News’s data. What they found was that some colleges come out on top pretty much regardless of the prioritization, but others move around quite a lot. And the top-ranked university can vary tremendously. Penn State, which is #48 using US News’s methodology, could be the best university in the country, by other standards.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Original post by timothy

BREAKING!
A source is telling me that Level 3 Communications and Packet 8 are having a system-wide network outage for the last 30 minutes. Level 3 is a huge provider of VoIP termination and I believe Packet8 uses their network for termination. Other VoIP service providers (Vonage?) will also be affected if indeed Level 3 is having an outage. I’m trying to confirm this as I type this.

I’m currently on hold (5min so far) for Packet8’s technical support and sent my contacts at 8Ҹ an email. I’ll update this post when I find out more.

Update: Just talked with Packet8 technical support and indeed they are experiencing outages. They also confirmed they use Level 3, so it appears Level 3 is the cause. Contacting Level 3 next. Stay tuned!

Tags: 8×8, Level 3, outage, Packet8, VoIP

Related Entries
• PackeҐ MobileTalk on iPhone Adds VoIP Calling -
  Jul 11, 2008
• Packet8 675xi VoIP for the SMB -
  Jul 24, 2008
• ACN IRIS 3000 Videophone & The State of the Videophone -
  Jul 15, 2008
• 8Ҹ’s PackeҐ Posts Steady Growth -
  Jan 30, 2008
• Skype 4.0.0.155 Beta 1 for Windows -
  Jul 31, 2008
• 3CX Free SIP Softphone -
  Jul 31, 2008
• Astricon, Win $100, and Party Hardy at ITEXPO -
  Jul 29, 2008
• sipgate vs. T-Mobile Round II -
  Jul 28, 2008
• College student could get 5 years for Hacking VoIP system & changing grades -
  Jul 28, 2008
• FCC to punish Comcast over Internet blocking -
  Jul 26, 2008

TrackBacks
| Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | VoIP & Gadgets Blog Home | Permalink: Level 3 & PackeҐ major outage

Copyright VoIP &amp Gadgets Blog

Original post by nafiz

I missed the 8×8/Packet8 news on July 16th about its new hosted small office “key” system and plug-and-play IP phones. Joan Citelli, Director of Corporate Communications emailed me asking for a briefing, but apparently I never replied since her email was still marked as unread and nothing in my Sent Items. Email overload I guess. The news was about 8×8, working with handset maker Aastra Telecom to provide a key system to the SMB market,which is part of the new Packet8 675xi series.

I happened to come across Carolyn Schuk’s article while surfing the web and came across her post about some 8×8 news that I missed. She writes, “8×8 is VoIP’s Rodney Dangerfield. It just gets no respect.” She has an excellent point and one which I wholeheartedly agree with.

Carolyn then lays out her case: “Consider how it stacks up against its far better-known pure-play VoIP competitor, Vonage: In the last five years, 8×8 revenues grew 460.3 percent while Vonage’s grew 0.0 percent. 8×8 made $700,000 during the first quarter of this year. Vonage lost $8.9 million and is shopping for a $215 million refinancing deal to stay out of bankruptcy. 8×8 holds 73 patents. Vonage just got its first. Despite this, Vonage’s stock price is $1.58 while 8×8’s is $1.03.”

She goes on to explain that the news coverage of the new Packet8 675xi series was sorely lacking, which sparked the Rodney Dangerfield comment. I’m guilty as charged, since I didn’t cover the news. Though it wasn’t for a lack of respect that I didn’t cover the Packet8 news. Sometimes it’s just impossible to cover all the daily VoIP news in addition to my testing of VoIP products, managing the MIS department as CTO, etc.

Well, better late than never. Today, I thought I’d give an overview of the new Packet8 675xi series.

First off, the Packet8 675xi IP phone series consists of three models — the 6753i entry level phone, 6755i intermediate phone and 6757i CT advanced phone. Essentially these are OEM’ed versions of the Aastra 53i, 55i, and 57i CT but with a special firmware load. Each model offers full duplex speakerphone functionality, programmable softkey appearances, LCD display screens, embedded XML browsers and up to nine call appearance lines. All models support Power over Ethernet and come equipped with dual auto-sensing switched Ethernet ports.

Here’s pictures of all 3 models:

The Packet8 675xi series include intercom paging and direct dial from a searchable corporate directory. Prices for the Packet8 675xi series range from $129.99 for the 6753i to $349.99 for the high end 6757i CT model which includes a DECT cordless phone as part of the bundled offer. The 6757i CT model’s built in DECT antenna allows the user to roam up to a 300 foot radius from the 6757i CT base telephone. The Packet8 675xi IP phones also feature corporate directory display and lookup, intercom paging, and shared line appearance.

The Packet8 675xi series of IP phones incorporates 8×8’s advanced NAT traversal technologies. This allows users to simply plug the phone into any Internet connection and immediately make or receive calls without performing any network or firewall configuration.

The high-end Packet8 6757i CT includes an integrated cordless handset with coverage up to 300,000 sq ft. It has a large 144 x 128 pixel graphical backlit LCD display and 6 dynamic context-sensitive softkeys, and with its large screen it can take full advantage of XML based programs.

Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, the Packet8 675xi series use SIP trunking to Packet8’s network infrastructure. All of the telephony functions such as transfer, conferencing, voicemail, etc. reside on the Packet8 network. Thus, you don’t need any costly IP-PBX hardware at the customer premise - you just need IP phones. This can be a huge cost savings for SMBs looking for an inexpensive VoIP solution, especially as the costs and margins for IP-PBXs continue to shrink with growing price pressure from more competition and open source solutions like Digium’s Asterisk.

PackeҐ/8×8 certainly has earned my admiration with some great products and services, a cool videophone, and more VoIP patents than you can shake a stick at! My ‘respect’ has been duly given.

Tags: 8×8, Aastra, Asterisk, Carolyn Schuk, Digium, IP phones, Packet8, Packet8 6757i, Packet8 6757i CT, Packet8 675xi, smb

Related Entries
• Packet8 MobileTalk on iPhone Adds VoIP Calling -
  Jul 11, 2008
• Leslie Conway Joins Digium -
  Jul 11, 2008
• Rev B of Astfin’s BRI (ISDN) Asterisk Appliance Arrives -
  Apr 29, 2008
• Podcast Interview with Digium CEO Danny Windham -
  Apr 17, 2008
• Hulk Smash Asterisk 1.6! -
  Apr 16, 2008
• PhoneFromHere.com & Digium Ink 5 Year Deal -
  Apr 09, 2008
• Asterisk USB Hub -
  Mar 31, 2008
• Sangoma Technologies Offers Lifetime Warranty -
  Mar 18, 2008
• Switchvox SMB 3.5 and AA60 Switchvox Appliance -
  Mar 18, 2008
• 8×8’s Packet8 Posts Steady Growth -
  Jan 30, 2008

TrackBacks
| Comments | Tag with del.icio.us | VoIP &amp Gadgets Blog Home | Permalink: PackeҐ 675xi VoIP for the SMB

Copyright VoIP & Gadgets Blog

Original post by Rico

PIKA T1/E1 and analog boards are now compatible with FreeSWITCH.

Some good news for PIKA this morning worth reading…

PIKA Technologies Inc., a developer of media-processing hardware and software, today announced that its entire family of analog and digital host media processing (HMP) boards is now compatible with FreeSWITCH, an open-source telephony platform typically used by large telecommunications companies deploying soft switches and other voice applications.

This is the latest partnership that PIKA has announced as part of its mission to support open-source-telephony application developers, having previously announced compatibility with the Asterisk platform.

&quotPIKA is thrilled to be partners with the FreeSWITCH community. This will mean more options for application development companies across the globe who are building FreeSWITCH-based solutions,&quot said Terry Atwood, vice president of sales, marketing and customer care at PIKA. &quotNow, FreeSWITCH users will have access to PIKA’s robust media-processing software and hardware, and as a result, be able to stabilize as well as add incremental value to their applications.&quot
FreeSWITCH is designed to facilitate the creation of voice and chat-driven products scaling from a soft phone up to a soft switch. It can be used as a simple switching engine, a PBX, a media gateway or a media server to host IVR applications using simple scripts or XML to control the call flow.

"I was really excited to get PIKA hardware working in FreeSWITCH," said Anthony Minessale, Lead Developer and author of FreeSWITCH. "It’s a welcome edition to our spec sheet. It’s been long anticipated by our user base and I’m pleased to announce we have it working in time for our May 26th 1.0 release. I’m looking forward to meeting with PIKA in person this August at Clue Con 2008 http://www.cluecon.com."

The PIKA product suite comprises a range of hardware and software designed to support applications built on open-source platforms. These building blocks are designed to provide cost-effective and reliable network connectivity to bridge between legacy TDM networks and open source-based IP telephony applications. With the PIKA Daytona analog FXO (trunk) and FXS (station) boards, and the PrimeNet digital T1/E1 boards, FreeSWITCH developers can select the hardware that meets their application&rsquos particular needs.

Tags: Asterisk, E1, FreeSWITCH, FXO, FXS, HMP, PIKA, T1, telephony cards, VoIP

Related Entries
• PIKA releases major enhancements to host-based media processing platform -
  Jun 27, 2007
• Sangoma Technologies Offers Lifetime Warranty -
  Mar 18, 2008
• PIKA for Asterisk boards now trixbox CE compatible -
  Jan 22, 2008
• Astfin announces Asterisk Appliance based on Blackfin -
  Oct 30, 2007
• Slacht - Asterisk-based PBX chooses PIKA -
  Jun 07, 2007
• Actiontec VoSKY Skype Gateway adds FXS ports -
  Jan 25, 2007
• trixbox 2.0 launches -
  Apr 15, 2008
• ISPBX Launches Asterisk appliances with CogoBlue Asterisk GUI -
  Apr 10, 2008
• PhoneFromHere.com & Digium Ink 5 Year Deal -
  Apr 09, 2008
• Asterisk USB Hub -
  Mar 31, 2008

Original post by nafiz

Filed under: Handhelds, Laptops, Tablet PCs

Ever since Intel compared the criticality of its (still) forthcoming Silverthorne (which now goes by Atom, if you couldn’t guess) processor to the original Pentium last June, we’ve all wondered just how fantasmical our worlds would become when this thing finally dropped. Now, however, Tom’s Hardware has discovered that the release may actually do more for Intel than we geeks. After consulting a source it believes to be quite credible, it found that the CPU — which will likely sell for upwards of $30 at the low-end — will cost Intel just “$6 to $8, including production, packaging and shipping.” Without busting out the abacus, it’s still fairly easy to see how profitable said chips could be if Intel can move these at even a snail’s pace, but of course, we’d take the dollars and cents estimates with a grain of salt until they actually hit the market.

[Via Digg]

&nbsp

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Darren Murph